Program, available to schools at no cost, pairs nursing and medical students.
The Institute of Medicine has identified interprofessional education (IPE) as a key innovation for achieving the triple aim of better care, better outcomes, and reduced health care costs. Yet, a shortage of qualified faculty and difficulty with aligning learners’ schedules often prevent sustainable and scalable IPE. Now, a team of New York University (NYU) researchers from both the College of Nursing and School of Medicine are addressing barriers to widespread adoption of IPE.
Researchers led by Maja Djukic, PhD, RN, assistant professor at the College of Nursing, and Marc Triola, MD, associate professor at the School of Medicine, designed a virtual IPE curriculum in which students were paired with a virtual team member to learn with, from, and about each other to improve collaboration and delivery of care.
Their paper, “E-Learning with virtual teammates: A novel approach to interprofessional education,” appeared in the Journal of Interprofessional Care
in June 2015. The study concludes that virtual IPE is an effective, efficient learning tool that may be of particular benefit to medical and nursing schools that do not have a partner school.
“Until the turn of the century, it was conventional for doctors, nurses, physician assistants, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals to be educated independently of one another,” says Djukic. “The problem,” explains Triola, “was that this model created a culture of fractured communication between medical professionals of different disciplines. Now we realize the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, provided the pieces fit together.”
Prior to this study, little was known about the effectiveness of e-learning with virtual teammates for IPE.
NYU researchers hypothesized that there would be no difference in the learning outcomes for each intervention. To determine the efficacy of virtual IPE, the researchers administered virtual teammates to 540 students and compared their outcomes with those of 220 students who had taken the traditional blended-learning curriculum a year prior.
In the blended-learning curriculum, students participated in one four-hour, in-person seminar and small-group learning session. They were paired with peers from the opposite school to complete the same seven e-modules as those in the virtual IPE cohort. The e-modules required learners from both disciplines to gain an understanding of cross-professional teamwork and collaboration perspectives by contributing comments.
To measure changes in their knowledge, students were given multiple-choice tests before and after the modules were administered. The researchers also gauged changes in students’ teamwork ability and attitudes. They found that support for their hypothesis varied according to the type of learner (i.e., medical or nursing) and the type of outcome (knowledge, skills, or attitudes).
The findings of this study are largely consistent with existing knowledge on the efficacy of e-learning and virtual patients for a variety of clinical topics. The study adds to this evidence by demonstrating that a virtual learning approach is not less effective than a blended-learning approach for IPE. Furthermore, this study highlights an interesting phenomenon that authenticity and relevance of the educational topic may be more compelling to the learner than fidelity.
In this study, faculty crafted virtual teammates to represent optimal interprofessional partners who provided helpful and positive clinical notes and comments. These virtual mimics of actual teammates had no apparent detrimental effects on student outcomes and provided all benefits of a scalable and truly asynchronous e-learning intervention.